1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 1999 Nissan XVL
To start off, 1999 Nissan XVL is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,953 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Nissan XVL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan XVL (156 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan XVL weights approximately 600 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Nissan XVL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 1999 Nissan XVL | |
| Make | DAF | Nissan |
| Model | Daffodil | XVL |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2953 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1260 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 80 L |
