1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Lamborghini Diablo
To start off, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,992 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo (543 HP @ 7100 RPM) has 517 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Lamborghini Diablo weights approximately 895 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Lamborghini Diablo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Lamborghini Diablo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Lamborghini Diablo | |
| Make | DAF | Lamborghini |
| Model | Daffodil | Diablo |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 5992 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 543 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7100 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1555 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2050 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2650 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 100 L |
