1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2000 Nissan Sentra
To start off, 2000 Nissan Sentra is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Nissan Sentra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Nissan Sentra (153 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Sentra should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Nissan Sentra weights approximately 480 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Nissan Sentra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2000 Nissan Sentra | |
Make | DAF | Nissan |
Model | Daffodil | Sentra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2630 mm |