1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 BMW X5
To start off, 2002 BMW X5 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,619 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 BMW X5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 BMW X5 (329 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 303 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 BMW X5 weights approximately 1520 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 BMW X5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 BMW X5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2002 BMW X5 | |
| Make | DAF | BMW |
| Model | Daffodil | X5 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4619 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 329 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1710 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 93 L |
