1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2002 Ford Mustang is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Mustang (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 364 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Mustang weights approximately 822 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | DAF | Ford |
| Model | Daffodil | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4601 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1482 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |
