1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2002 Hyundai Equus
To start off, 2002 Hyundai Equus is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,497 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Hyundai Equus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Hyundai Equus (220 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 194 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Hyundai Equus should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Hyundai Equus weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2002 Hyundai Equus | |
Make | DAF | Hyundai |
Model | Daffodil | Equus |
Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 220 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1990 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 80 L |