1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2004 Lincoln LS
To start off, 2004 Lincoln LS is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 206 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Lincoln LS weights approximately 1027 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2004 Lincoln LS | |
Make | DAF | Lincoln |
Model | Daffodil | LS |
Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 232 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 68 L |