1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,151 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito (120 HP @ 1800 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2006 Mercedes-Benz Vito | |
Make | DAF | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Daffodil | Vito |
Year Released | 1965 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2151 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 78 L |