1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2008 Dodge Dakota is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Dodge Dakota (302 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 1086 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Dodge Dakota is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Dodge Dakota will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Dodge Dakota | |
Make | DAF | Dodge |
Model | Daffodil | Dakota |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 302 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1746 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3340 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 83 L |