1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2008 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2008 Smart ForTwo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2008 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Smart ForTwo (98 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2008 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | DAF | Smart |
Model | Daffodil | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1965 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 2730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 52 L |