1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1383 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | DAF | Jeep |
Model | Daffodil | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 3778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2043 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 85 L |