1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML (210 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil.
Because 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
| Make | DAF | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Daffodil | ML |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 2987 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 210 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2920 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 95 L |
