1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 746 cc (2 cylinders), 1965 DAF Daffodil is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Tata Nano (35 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Tata Nano should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DAF Daffodil weights approximately 60 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | DAF | Tata |
| Model | Daffodil | Nano |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 37 L |
