1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Ford Escape
To start off, 2010 Ford Escape is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford Escape is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Escape (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Escape weights approximately 1285 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Ford Escape is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford Escape will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Ford Escape | |
Make | DAF | Ford |
Model | Daffodil | Escape |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 76 L |