1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 355 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 672 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | DAF | Toyota |
Model | Daffodil | Tundra |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 100 L |