1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,984 cc, 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 235 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco weights approximately 638 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Volkswagen Scirocco | |
| Make | DAF | Volkswagen |
| Model | Daffodil | Scirocco |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1298 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4256 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1404 mm |
