1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2010 Volvo XC70
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo XC70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC70 (217 HP) has 191 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC70 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC70 weights approximately 1220 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC70 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2010 Volvo XC70 | |
Make | DAF | Volvo |
Model | Daffodil | XC70 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 217 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4838 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1862 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1604 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2815 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |