1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2011 Acura TSX
To start off, 2011 Acura TSX is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Acura TSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura TSX (201 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura TSX should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura TSX weights approximately 914 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Acura TSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2011 Acura TSX | |
Make | DAF | Acura |
Model | Daffodil | TSX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1574 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4714 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1839 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2708 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 70 L |