1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2012 BMW X1
To start off, 2012 BMW X1 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 BMW X1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW X1 (143 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 BMW X1 weights approximately 885 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 BMW X1 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 BMW X1 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DAF Daffodil | 2012 BMW X1 | |
Make | DAF | BMW |
Model | Daffodil | X1 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 746 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4454 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 1798 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1545 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 61 L |