1965 DAF Daffodil vs. 2013 BMW X5 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 M is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 521 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW X5 M weights approximately 1775 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW X5 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DAF Daffodil | 2013 BMW X5 M | |
| Make | DAF | BMW |
| Model | Daffodil | X5 M |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 746 cc | 4395 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 547 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2435 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3620 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1450 mm | 2197 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1764 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2060 mm | 2933 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 33 L | 85 L |
