1965 DKW F 102 vs. 1953 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1965 DKW F 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 59 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Jeep CJ weights approximately 206 kg more than 1965 DKW F 102.
Because 1953 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 DKW F 102. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1953 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Jeep CJ (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1953 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW F 102 | 1953 Jeep CJ | |
| Make | DKW | Jeep |
| Model | F 102 | CJ |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 59 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1116 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2040 mm |
