1965 DKW F 102 vs. 1996 Mini MK VI
To start off, 1996 Mini MK VI is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,175 cc (3 cylinders), 1965 DKW F 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 DKW F 102 (59 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1996 Mini MK VI. (41 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1965 DKW F 102 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mini MK VI. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW F 102 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1996 Mini MK VI. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 DKW F 102 (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mini MK VI. (69 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1965 DKW F 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mini MK VI.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW F 102 | 1996 Mini MK VI | |
Make | DKW | Mini |
Model | F 102 | MK VI |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 41 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 69 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2040 mm |