1965 DKW F 102 vs. 1996 Rover 200
To start off, 1996 Rover 200 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,395 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Rover 200 (102 HP) has 43 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Rover 200 weights approximately 120 kg more than 1965 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Rover 200 (127 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 1996 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW F 102 | 1996 Rover 200 | |
Make | DKW | Rover |
Model | F 102 | 200 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2510 mm |