1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2004 Dodge Dakota
To start off, 2004 Dodge Dakota is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Dakota is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Dakota (210 HP) has 151 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Dakota should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Dakota weights approximately 731 kg more than 1965 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Dodge Dakota (319 Nm) has 216 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2004 Dodge Dakota will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW F 102 | 2004 Dodge Dakota | |
| Make | DKW | Dodge |
| Model | F 102 | Dakota |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3687 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 210 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 319 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1641 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3330 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 76 L |
