1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2009 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2009 Dodge Charger is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Charger (425 HP) has 366 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Charger weights approximately 1050 kg more than 1965 DKW F 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Charger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Charger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Charger (570 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 467 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102. 2009 Dodge Charger has automatic transmission and 1965 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1965 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Charger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW F 102 | 2009 Dodge Charger | |
Make | DKW | Dodge |
Model | F 102 | Charger |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 6059 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 425 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 570 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 5090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 72 L |