1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2009 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Eos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP) has 138 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Eos (207 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW F 102 | 2009 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | DKW | Volkswagen |
| Model | F 102 | Eos |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 197 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 207 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 55 L |
