1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Honda CR-V (148 HP) has 89 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Honda CR-V (350 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm). This means 2012 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1965 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1965 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW F 102 | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | DKW | Honda |
| Model | F 102 | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 350 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4554 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 58 L |
