1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2012 Peugeot 5008
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 5008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Peugeot 5008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 5008 (108 HP) has 49 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 5008 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 5008 (240 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2012 Peugeot 5008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102. 2012 Peugeot 5008 has automatic transmission and 1965 DKW F 102 has manual transmission. 1965 DKW F 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot 5008 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW F 102 | 2012 Peugeot 5008 | |
| Make | DKW | Peugeot |
| Model | F 102 | 5008 |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1175 cc | 1560 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 108 HP |
| Torque | 103 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 1750 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1835 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2735 mm |
