1965 DKW F 102 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 102 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (298 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 102. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 102.
Because 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Mercedes-Benz E. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW F 102, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (370 Nm @ 5250 RPM) has 267 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 102. (103 Nm @ 2250 RPM). This means 2013 Mercedes-Benz E will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 102.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW F 102 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | F 102 | E |
Year Released | 1965 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1175 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 298 HP |
Torque | 103 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 86 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |