1965 DKW F 11 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2000 Ford TS-50 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,989 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford TS-50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford TS-50 (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1965 DKW F 11. (34 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford TS-50 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW F 11. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 478 kg more than 1965 DKW F 11. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Ford TS-50 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford TS-50. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TS-50 (175 Nm) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 DKW F 11. (71 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TS-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 DKW F 11.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW F 11 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | F 11 | TS-50 |
Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 796 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 71 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 132 L |