1965 DKW Munga vs. 1949 Hudson Commodore
To start off, 1965 DKW Munga is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Hudson Commodore. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Hudson Commodore would be higher. At 4,166 cc (8 cylinders), 1949 Hudson Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Hudson Commodore (128 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Hudson Commodore should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1949 Hudson Commodore weights approximately 546 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1949 Hudson Commodore. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 1949 Hudson Commodore | |
| Make | DKW | Hudson |
| Model | Munga | Commodore |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1949 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4166 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 128 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 6.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1656 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1960 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3160 mm |
