1965 DKW Munga vs. 1962 Isuzu Bellel
To start off, 1965 DKW Munga is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Isuzu Bellel would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Isuzu Bellel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Isuzu Bellel (55 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Isuzu Bellel should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Isuzu Bellel weights approximately 220 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Isuzu Bellel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1962 Isuzu Bellel | |
Make | DKW | Isuzu |
Model | Munga | Bellel |
Year Released | 1965 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 55 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2540 mm |