1965 DKW Munga vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 170 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 57 L |