1965 DKW Munga vs. 1969 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1969 Riley Kestrel is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,275 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Riley Kestrel is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Riley Kestrel (64 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Riley Kestrel should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 200 kg more than 1969 Riley Kestrel.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Riley Kestrel. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 1969 Riley Kestrel | |
| Make | DKW | Riley |
| Model | Munga | Kestrel |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1969 |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1275 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3730 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1540 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 25 L |
