1965 DKW Munga vs. 1982 Suzuki Cervo
To start off, 1982 Suzuki Cervo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 980 cc (3 cylinders), 1965 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. (26 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 575 kg more than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Suzuki Cervo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1982 Suzuki Cervo | |
Make | DKW | Suzuki |
Model | Munga | Cervo |
Year Released | 1965 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 538 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2040 mm |