1965 DKW Munga vs. 1984 Lotus Etna
To start off, 1984 Lotus Etna is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,946 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Lotus Etna is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1984 Lotus Etna (331 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 288 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1984 Lotus Etna should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1984 Lotus Etna. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 1984 Lotus Etna | |
| Make | DKW | Lotus |
| Model | Munga | Etna |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 331 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.2:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4270 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1150 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2520 mm |
