1965 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Mazda 626
To start off, 1995 Mazda 626 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (161 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda 626 weights approximately 156 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1995 Mazda 626 | |
Make | DKW | Mazda |
Model | Munga | 626 |
Year Released | 1965 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1266 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |