1965 DKW Munga vs. 1995 Renault Clio
To start off, 1995 Renault Clio is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,171 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Renault Clio (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 255 kg more than 1995 Renault Clio.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1995 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1995 Renault Clio | |
Make | DKW | Renault |
Model | Munga | Clio |
Year Released | 1965 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1171 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 38 L |