1965 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Honda CR-V
To start off, 1996 Honda CR-V is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Honda CR-V (128 HP) has 85 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Honda CR-V should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Honda CR-V weights approximately 390 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Honda CR-V. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 1996 Honda CR-V | |
Make | DKW | Honda |
Model | Munga | CR-V |
Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 128 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.8 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |