1965 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Mazda Sentia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Sentia is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,952 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Sentia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Sentia weights approximately 450 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Sentia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 1996 Mazda Sentia | |
| Make | DKW | Mazda |
| Model | Munga | Sentia |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2952 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 0 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2860 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 70 L |
