1965 DKW Munga vs. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,266 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Mercedes-Benz E is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E (275 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 232 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mercedes-Benz E weights approximately 942 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mercedes-Benz E. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 1996 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | DKW | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Munga | E |
| Year Released | 1965 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4266 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2052 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 80 L |
