1965 DKW Munga vs. 2000 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 75 kg more than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Seat Inca Kombi. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2000 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | DKW | Seat |
| Model | Munga | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1035 kg |
