1965 DKW Munga vs. 2001 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2001 Mercury Sable is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Mercury Sable (153 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercury Sable weights approximately 400 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Mercury Sable. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2001 Mercury Sable | |
| Make | DKW | Mercury |
| Model | Munga | Sable |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 2986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 153 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3950 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1510 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2760 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 85 L |
