1965 DKW Munga vs. 2002 Acura CL
To start off, 2002 Acura CL is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,210 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura CL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura CL (260 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura CL should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura CL weights approximately 470 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura CL. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2002 Acura CL | |
| Make | DKW | Acura |
| Model | Munga | CL |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 3210 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 260 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1580 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1800 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 65 L |
