1965 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,560 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford C-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (110 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 216 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford C-MAX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2650 mm |