1965 DKW Munga vs. 2003 Ford Ka
To start off, 2003 Ford Ka is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ka is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ka (73 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ka should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 DKW Munga weights approximately 240 kg more than 2003 Ford Ka.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2003 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2003 Ford Ka | |
Make | DKW | Ford |
Model | Munga | Ka |
Year Released | 1965 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 1294 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 42 L |