1965 DKW Munga vs. 2004 Ford Expedition
To start off, 2004 Ford Expedition is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford Expedition is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Expedition (232 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 189 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Expedition should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Expedition weights approximately 1337 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2004 Ford Expedition | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Expedition |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4605 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 232 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2447 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 106 L |
