1965 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2005 Ford Econovan is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,788 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econovan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Econovan (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Econovan should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Econovan weights approximately 185 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Econovan. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2005 Ford Econovan | |
| Make | DKW | Ford |
| Model | Munga | Econovan |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 1788 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2210 mm |
