1965 DKW Munga vs. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP) has 239 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1330 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1965 DKW Munga | 2005 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | DKW | Land Rover |
| Model | Munga | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1965 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 980 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 43 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1930 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2890 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 100 L |
