1965 DKW Munga vs. 2009 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2009 GMC Acadia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 3,599 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 GMC Acadia weights approximately 1503 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1965 DKW Munga | 2009 GMC Acadia | |
Make | DKW | GMC |
Model | Munga | Acadia |
Year Released | 1965 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 980 cc | 3599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 43 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 11.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 2613 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3450 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 31 L | 83 L |